My 1996 F-250 4.9 liters inl-6 have 135,000 miles on it. These fuel tanks have to be come off and clean inside and it resist rust really well. The rear fuel pump was bad and I replace the front fuel pump for MFI-EFI and the replacement pump is worth $250.00 dollars for each. I plug up the color blue gas line between the rear tank and front tank. Above consumption difference is the average for all Ford S-Max produced from 2006 to 2020. For Ford S-Max produced up to 2013 the difference in real fuel consumption by user reviews is on average +16%, while for those produced after 2013 it is on average +32%. 5. 2022 Lamborghini Aventador. More fuel-efficient on the highway than a Bugatti Chiron Pur Sport, the Lamborghini Aventador scores an EPA estimated mpg of 9 mpg city and 15 mpg highway in both the roadster and coupe variants. The Aventador is powered by a V-12 engine producing 759 horsepower and 531 lb-ft of torque. It was an all-iron 6.5-liter ‘IDI’ diesel V8. It could muster around 215hp and 440lb-ft of torque in its top trim and on a good day. The 6.6 aluminum-head Duramax, on the other hand, could deliver 300hp and 520lb-ft of torque. That’s its first iteration, and it has only gotten torquier and sprightlier with age. Might want to sell that and get an F250 with a 351 and a ZF trans. 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks - Poor performance and gas milage 1995 4.9 liter - I have a 1995 ford 1/2 ton 4.9 liter 5 speed, I bought this truck with 100000km (60000miles) on it. I have replaced the plugs, wires, cap and router, air fiter to a k&N, had a computer MPG, running costs & CO2 Rating. 3.0 out of 5. Fuel economy for the 2.0-litre EcoBlue diesel engines is fine, if not overly impressive, as the Ford S-MAX lags behind rivals such as the This time, over the exact same route, at the same speeds, the Fit went 411.3 miles. At the Chevron station in Santa Monica, our Fit drank 9.76 gallons, translating into 42.14 mpg—nearly the Modern construction. The name “EcoBoost” stands for: direct fuel injection, turbocharging, variable valve timing. Fuel consumption similar to the 1.6 Turbo engine is associated with high fuel consumption, but is out of date – the 1.6 EcoBoost requires as much fuel as 1.6 Duratec, but is much more dynamic. Timing belt Y2nv.

ford s max poor fuel consumption